[
home |
resume |
contact |
science |
art |
personal |
email
]
Davies, J., & Goel, A. K. (2003). Representation issues in visual
analogy. in R. Alterman and D. Kirsh (Eds.) Proceedings of
The 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Society. 300--305.
Cite this for:
- Visual knowledge alone is sufficient for some analogical problem-solving.
- Symoblic, descriptive visual representations are useful for transfer.
- Grouping appears to be necessary for some transfer of some
transformations.
BibTex Entry:
@InProceedings{DaviesGoel2003,
author = {Davies, Jim and Goel, Ashok K.},
title = {Representation issues in visual analogy},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society},
OPTpages = {300--305},
year = {2003},
OPTeditor = {Alterman, R. and Kirsh, D.},
OPTaddress = {Boston, MA},
OPTpublisher = {Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers},
OPTnote = {},
OPTannote = {}
}
Choose download format: [
PDF |
PS |
Tex ]
From the
Visual Analogy research theme.
Abstract
Visual analogies are analogies based on visual similarity.
Galatea is a computer program that addresses the transfer task in
visual analogies in the context of problem solving. Each source case
in Galatea contains a problem-solving procedure, represented as a
series of knowledge states and transformations between them. Source
cases and target problems are represented in a symbolic language whose
primitives pertain only to spatial objects and relations, and
operations on them. Given visual representations of a source case and
a target problem, and a mapping between the first knowledge state in
the source and the target, Galatea adapts and transfers the problem
solving procedure in the source to the target. In this paper, we
describe some representation issues that arose in developing Galatea
and its answers to them.
Back to Jim Davies's list of
publications.
JimDavies
(
jim@jimdavies.org
)