[
CogSci Summaries home |
UP |
email
]
http://www.jimdavies.org/summaries/
Simon H.A. (1995). Explaining the Ineffable: AI on the Topics of
Intuition, Insight and Inspiration.
Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, 1, 939-948.
@InProceedings{Simon1995,
author = {Herbert A. Simon},
title = {Explaining the Ineffable: AI on the topics of
intuition, insight, and inspiration},
year = {1995},
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint
Conference on Artificial Intelligence"
volume = {1},
pages = {939--948},
}
Author of the summary: Bragoszewska A., 2006 , 3ab5@qlink.queensu.ca
Cite this paper for:
- Cognition as empirical science [p.940]
- AI furthering study of psychology [p.939]
- AI modeling insight [p.943]
- AI modeling intuition [p.942]
- AI modeling inspiration [p.945]
- AI modeling of human responses serves as aid to better understand
those responses [p.948]
- Suggested criteria for identifying intuition[p.941]
- Suggested criteria for identifying insight [p.943]
- Suggested criteria for identifying inspiration [p.945]
- Intuition in EPAM program [p.942]
- Insight in EPAM-GPS - like program [p.943]
- Inspiration in BACON program [p.946]
- Experiments on cognitive phenomena can be constructed and tested
with scientific process [p.946]
- BACON rediscovers Kepler's Third Law [p.946]
- Cognitive phenomenon occurs in program which was not originally
designed for that purpose [p.942]
- Tests for intuition experiments [p.943]
- Intuition is recognition [p.943]
SUMMARY IN BRIEF:
By carefully considering the cognitive phenomena to be tested, it is
possible to agree on key defining characteristics.
When the phenomenon can be recognized accurately, it can be tested and
studied with equally accurate experiments.
With this strategy, insight, intuition, and inspiration were
classified,and based on their classification it was
shown that there exist AI programs that display these phenomena. In
turn, modeling these phenomena resulted in a
deepened understanding of the phenomena themselves, and therefore of
the human mind.
INDEPTH:
INTUITION
CHARACTERIZED BY:[p.941]
- solution is reached rapidly after problem is presented
- problem solver is unable to give clear account of the steps taken
to arrive at the solution
STUDIED IN:[p.942]
EPAM program, designed originally to stimulate human rote verbal
learning.
Consists of tree-like discrimination net.
Has short term memory where it retains a "few" new symbols for no
longer than 2
seconds, unless it has time to "rehearse them".
Nets grow in response to presented stimuli.
EPAM learns appropriate discriminations by experience, using the
feedback ("right"/"wrong")
offered to its responses.
EPAM recognizes patterns once learned.
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE: [p.942]
- EPAM stimulated with a collection of medical symptoms(something it
has dealt with before),
recognizes this pattern and can very quickly access the
information it contains about the disease.
Result of recognition (name of disease) remains in short-term
memory, will be reported by EPAM.
- The program is however not designed to report the results of each
of the individual tests it
performed on the input data. An account of how the solution is
found is not available.
OTHER NOTES: [p.943]
Experiments designed to test intuition should be carried out on
subject matter that allows easy
verification of the fact / correctness, to avoid "false intuition".
Intuition is actually recognition.
INSIGHT
CHARACTERIZED BY:[p.943]
- (1) period of unsuccessful work and frustration preceeds the
occurence of insight
- (2) the sudden idea that follows (1) is not always the solution,
sometimes it is "the conviction of its imminence"
- (3) new understanding / feeling for the problem , new way of
representing it occurs sometimes:
- (4) period of "incubation" preceeds occurence of insight, during
this time the problem is not consciously attended to
STUDIED IN: [p.944]
A program that combines capabilities of EPAM and the General Problem
Solver, found capable of
expressing the following integral properties, which support the four
characteristics of insight.
Assume the program is in mid-search:
- it is capable of conducting a selective search for a problem
solution, which is unsuccessful for
the first while
- it holds information about the problem and knowledge about how to
attack it in long-term memory
- at the moment, is following a path that will not lead to a
solution and is not aware of this
- it is assumed the search is serial, and the flow of control in the
program controls direction
of the search, via attentional mechanisms
- information about the local situation is held in short-term
memory, it is continuously changing
- simultaneously, the program is noticing, learning and storing in
long-tem memory the more permanent
features of the problem -- change, improvement in the information
available for solving the problem
- interrupt mechanism programmed into the control structure -- will
pause search after some period of
unsuccessful efforts, and change attention to a part of search
whish pertains to a different representation
of the problem or a different search control structure
- when interruption occurs, control information held in short-term
memory is purged -- if search is
restarted later, this information will not be available and the
search might explore new direction
- this new search direction is likely to be more productive than the
previous one, since information
stored in long-term memory will help determine the new search
direction
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE: [p.944]
The model of insight summarised with the above nine properties is
supported by the research of
Craig Kaplan and H.A. Simon (Kaplan and Simon, 1990).
Human subjects were asked to solve a puzzle (cover chessboard with
specific number of dominoes). The process of
solving the problem, and specifically the phenomenon of insight was
studied. The observations serve to
support the nine properties- model of insight.
OTHER NOTES: [p.944]
The nine integral properties of the EPAM-GPS - like program were
identified by evidence
obtained while many different kinds of tasks were being performed.
[p.945]
It was shown in both the human and computer program studies, that the
key mechanisms for finding a solution
were the 'emptying' of the short term memory , and allowing for a new
representation of the original problem.
INSPIRATION
CHARACTERIZED AS: [p.945]
The production of novelty, using "combinatorics".
STUDIED IN:[p.946]
BACON program, designed to take uninterpreted numerical data as input
and outputting scientific laws that fit
the data.
Not always successful.
Starts with simple functions, uses "combinatorial means" to create
more complex ones.
Data guides BACON as to which function to try next -- program tests
ratios of the variables to interpret data.
If the problem involves data concerning more than two variables, BACON
changes one independent variable at a time
to find conditional dependencies among small sets of variables. It
then uses this information to explore the
effects of altering other variables.
BACON's ability to discover new concepts is attributed to its final
heuristic:
"When [BACON] discovers that there is an invariant relation in the
interaction between two or more elements in a
situatuion, it assigns a new property to the elements, measuring its
magnitude by the relative strength of each
element's action (one of the elements is assigned a unit value,
becoming the standard.)"
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE:[p.946]
When provided with data on the periods of revolution and distances
from the sun for different planets, BACON first
arrived at Kepler's erroneous square law but it quickly rejects it as
an insufficient fit to the data, and goes on
to find the correct law.
OTHER NOTES: [p.946]
In searching for the relationship between a planet's period of
revolution and its distance from the sun, Kepler
initially made a mistake in his evaluation of the data; years later he
found the correct law.
Summary author's notes:
Ineffable (from Oxford Concise): "too great for description in words"
H.A. Simon is careful not to suggest fantastic implications of this
research, instead he points
out that these studies should serve to show how AI can serve to
further other fields of study
such as human psychology and cognition, and that they can inturn serve
to further it.
Back to the Cognitive Science Summaries
homepage
Cognitive Science Summaries Webmaster:
JimDavies
(jim@jimdavies.org)