@Article{, author = {Hernan Casakin and Gabriela Goldschmidt}, title = {Expertise and the use of visual analogy: Implications for design education}, journal = {Design Studies}, year = {1999}, OPTvolume = {20}, OPTpages = {153--175}, }
The original paper can be found here in PDF form.
Medin & Ross 1990: experts have large qualitative knowledge bases.
Beveridge and Parkins and Novick showed that diagrams can help with problem solving.
Goldschmidt 1994, 1995: designers in the search process identify images as source analogs.
This research investigates the question: Do designers use analogy? Do novices as well as experts?
Hypothesis: If subjects are asked to use analogy and relevant displays are given, the designs produced are better. [156]
Participants did a design task with about 2 dozen pictures in front of them. Some images were from architecture, some were not. Protocols were taken [158].
Experienced architects were the judges. Their scores were reliable. Some participants paid attention to deep structures in the source analogs and solved the problem well.[162] Some noticed surface similarities and produced poorer solutions. [164]
Results of other conditions not reported here indicate that having the pictures leads to better solutions.
Asking people to use analogies helped both novices and experts. [172]