Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano,
J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in
naturalistic one-on-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
vol. 9, pp495-522.
@Article{,
author = {A. C. Graesser, N. K. Person, J. P. Magliano},
title = {Collaborative dialogue patterns in
naturalistic one-on-one tutoring},
journal = {Applied Cognitive Psychology},
year = {1995},
OPTvolume = {9},
OPTpages = {495--522},
}
Author of the summary: Jim R. Davies, 2000, jim@jimdavies.org
Cite this paper for:
tutoring is superior to classroom learning
Evidence against active student learning
tutors, not students, ask most questions
most student questions do not address knowledge deficits but
confirm what they already know [p501]
amount of knowledge deficit questions did not correlate with
performance.
Sophisticated teaching strategies like the socratic method were
non-existant with unskilled tutors [p502]
Tutors typically use curriculum scripts
tutors typically coach students through example problems or
collaboratively solve them.
Tutors used almost no authentic anchored cases but only
symbolic examples or concrete referents. [p503]
Conversational turns were 5 in the research methods domain, 10
in the algebra domain. Typical classroom conversations have 3
turns. [p504]
Successive revision of questions on the tutor's part get easier
to answer
34% of neutral feedback (on audio) turned out to be positive or
negative when the video was looked at [p507]
Fox (1991) reported skilled tutors use silence to signify
negative feedback
pumping: giving positive or neutral feedback to get a student
to refine an answer
Deep reasoning questions are more prevelant in tutoring [p511]
Answering "yes" to a "do you understand?" question is not
correlated to performance. Answering "no" is positively
correlated. [p512]
Neither frequency of student questions nor knowledge deficit
questions correlated with performance, but freq of deep
reasoning questions did.
Modest correlation between completely correct answers to tutor
questions and performance [p513]
It is very difficult for tutors to identify bugs. Here ITS
systems may outperform real tutors. [p514]
"Tutors adopt a gentle indirect stance when students commit
errors." unlike Anderson's LISP tutor. This may be good for motivation.