[
CogSci Summaries home |
UP |
email
]
http://www.jimdavies.org/summaries/
Novick, L. R. & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by
analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition. Vol 17 (3). 398--415.
@Article{,
author = {Laura R. Novick and Keith J. Holyoak},
title = {Mathematical problem solving by analogy},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition},
year = {1991},
OPTvolume = {17},
OPTnumber = {3},
OPTpages = {398--415},
}
Author of the summary: Jim Davies, 2003, jim@jimdavies.org
Cite this paper for:
- "mapping the features of the source and target problems and the
process of adapting the source solutoin procedure for use in
solving the target problem were clearly distinguished." [abstract]
- "Successful mapping was found to be insufficient for successful
transfer." [abstract]
- Evidence that transfer stage is difficult above and beyond mapping.
- Even with the mapping given, only 50% (exp 1) and 32% (exp 2)
of Ss got it right.
Experiment 1:
Participants solved word algebra problems. Prediction is
that transfer and adaptation is difficult even if you know the
mapping. They predicted worse to better solutions through the
following hint types:
- no hint (results: 19%)
- retrieval hint (results: 35%)
- retrieval and concept mapping hint (results: 37%)
- retrieval and numerical mapping hint (more specific to problems) (results: 50%)
Trend was significant (p < .003).
The one hypothesis not confirmed was the difference between retrieval
hint and concept mapping hint.
"The fact that only 50% of the subjects in the number-mapping
condition were successful at transfer strongly suggests that the
adaptation process is a major source of difficulty, separate from the
difficulty of the mapping process."
They also found that schema quality correlates to analogical transfer
strength, and that schema quality is related to transfer but not to
nonanalogical solution.
Experiment 2:
Among the Hypotheses were:
- numerical mapping is closer to adaptation than conceptual
(supported again).
- Tranfer is facilitated by understanding of reasons for the
alignments in mapping. (unsupported)
- Analogical reasoning ability predicts analogical problem
solving ability. (math SAT predicts it only (not verbal or
analogical ability) note: these were math problems.
Experiment 1 was supported again, this time with only 32% of people
getting it right given number mapping!
In the protocol studies, mapping of concepts was barely mentioned. "It
appears that the process of mapping the concepts occurred so quickly
that usually it was not verbalized." But mentions of mapping
numbers was abundant. "These mappings always occurred in the
course of attempting to adapt the source solution to the target
problem."
Summary author's notes:
Back to the Cognitive Science Summaries homepage
Cognitive Science Summaries Webmaster:
JimDavies
(jim@jimdavies.org)
Last modified: Wed Jan 29 12:35:04 EST 2003